Too Big to Co-Move
Concentrated sectors co-move less with the rest of the market: a one-point rise in top-three share lowers monthly R² by 0.75 points (permutation p = 0.04), though concentration does not explain why markets disconnected.
Research / RateWalk: Forecasting Fed Decisions
Can a memoryless Markov chain on the Fed's policy moves forecast the next decision out of sample, and does conditioning on the inflation regime help?

I ask whether a memoryless Markov chain on the Federal Reserve's policy moves can forecast the next rate decision out of sample, and whether conditioning the chain on the inflation regime improves it. Under strict no-look-ahead discipline, with CPI read at its real ALFRED release date so revisions never leak, the answer is a clean bias-variance story. A first-order chain beats a climatology baseline. Naive conditioning on the CPI regime overfits and hurts, because it splits sparse transition data across regimes. Shrinking each regime row toward the pooled chain (an empirical-Bayes Dirichlet prior) recovers a small but consistent edge that replicates across the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, survives a data-driven shrinkage strength, and sits on a broad parameter plateau rather than a tuned point. Against the market's own pricing, proxied by a walk-forward-calibrated Treasury-curve signal, the chain wins overall (log-loss 1.06 vs. 1.20) but the decomposition is sharper: the market is better on 82% of actual move months, the chain on 85% of holds, and a no-look-ahead adaptive blend beats both. The edge lives in probabilistic calibration: a duration-timing strategy built on the signal does not beat a constant-duration benchmark risk-adjusted. I report the negatives as part of the result.

@techreport{yadav2026ratewalk,
title = {RateWalk: Forecasting Fed Rate Decisions with a Shrunk Markov Chain},
author = {Yadav, Tanishk},
year = {2026},
institution = {NYU Tandon School of Engineering},
type = {Working paper}
}
More research
Concentrated sectors co-move less with the rest of the market: a one-point rise in top-three share lowers monthly R² by 0.75 points (permutation p = 0.04), though concentration does not explain why markets disconnected.
Built with only past data, capped leverage and trading costs, volatility management lifts momentum's Sharpe ratio from 0.43 to 0.94 and helps none of the other five factors. A closed-form formula for momentum's market beta explains why.
A full-stack platform that extracts risk-neutral moments from live option chains without a pricing model; a GARCH vol-targeted sleeve beat SPY on risk (Sharpe 0.85 vs 0.68) while naive short-variance harvesting lost money.
Four independent stress signals that must agree before de-risking: maximum drawdown -6.2% vs -41.7% for SPY, and the same calibration transfers to factor and international portfolios.